🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Documents seen by journalists originating from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the African officials demands plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting amendments to a draft bill that include decreasing the proposed size of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Activist commentary

“Were I in government, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” commented the health advocate.

Over seven thousand citizens a year succumb to smoking-associated diseases, according to World Health Organization estimates.

Chimbala said the letter was known to have been circulated to various ministerial offices and was in circulation among community advocacy networks.

International corporate influence worries

This occurs during wider concerns about business sector influence with public health regulations. Recently, WHO officials issued a warning that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“There is proof of corporate influence everywhere. Manufacturer hallmarks are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” commented the tobacco industry watchdog.

Potential consequences

“If a tobacco control measure doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the cost might be borne in lives of people who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure going through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that graphic health warnings cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

In the letter, the corporation proposes this be decreased to 30% or 50% “following international guideline limits”, postponed for minimum one year after the legislation is approved.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a caution must occupy at least 50% of the cigarette package face “and attempt to encompass as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Within Britain, warnings need to encompass nearly two-thirds of a product container sides.

Scented product controversy

The company seeks the removal of broad restrictions on scented smoking items, claiming that it would push consumers toward “illicitly sold” products. The corporation recommends restricting fewer varieties of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The proposed legislation suggests penalties for various offences “varying from a percentage of annual turnover to a decade in prison”.

Corporate defense

In the letter, the corporate leader of the Zambian branch says the corporation is focused on good corporate behaviour” and “backs the goals of governments to lower tobacco use and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “some regulations can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued BAT’s proposed changes would “dilute these regulations so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that numerous similar measures were present in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “total double standard”, he commented.

“We reside in a international community. If I plant tobacco in my back yard and collect the yield and sell it out – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to benefit personally and all the generations of my children while my community's youth are dying … is in itself total emotional bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had not caused companies to close, Chimbala said. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative stated: “BAT Zambia conducts its business in compliance with applicable local laws. Additionally, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the relevant frameworks which allow for relevant group engagement in policymaking.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, adding that young individuals should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion developing rules to achieve intended public health goals, while recognizing the range of entitlements and duties on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, mentioning that the company's suggestions “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and cigarette sector, which involves increasing amounts of illicit trade”.

The country's office of trade, commerce and industry was solicited for statement.