🔗 Share this article

The movie features a talented cast, telling the true story of coach Brendan Ingle, who guided a cheeky Yorkshire teenager from Yemeni migrant parents. Known as “Prince” Naseem Hamed, the fighter was coached to stand up to racist bullies and molded into a celebrity titleholder in the 1990s. Ingle cultivated his showboating arrogance and powerful punches, but after becoming rich, the boxer turned against his mentor, excluding him and turning him into a mix of John Falstaff and Broadway Danny Rose.

Cast and Characters

Brosnan portrays Ingle; El-Masry embodies the part of Hamed, and Stephens appears as the assertive promoter Frank Warren, who recognized the goldmine that Ingle had discovered.

Where the Movie Falls Short

However, the movie honestly misses the fighter’s agility: the boxing sequences flow well, but the crucial story between them is consistently dull and monotonous. It lacks subtlety or light and shade in the portrayal of the protagonist himself, and the actor, an otherwise excellent talent, isn’t given the chance to display any depth or much of what might make his role really interesting – even though he’s clearly been working out and appears convincing in the ring.

Problems with Script and Sound

The drama is often burdened by utilitarian, explanatory dialogue that inform you exactly what is going on and what we are meant to feel (“Your journey began your career at age seven …”). This is the sort of dialogue that streaming-TV executives call “double-screen”, making sure you know what’s going on while you’re viewing the movie but also checking your device. Additionally, the background music is overpowering, at times nearly overwhelming, particularly in the scene where Hamed gets too excited visiting Warren in his luxurious residence.

Performances and Key Moments

Although the leads do their very best, their relationship doesn’t quite comes to life, and the big set-piece boxing moments are often anticlimactically truncated. A key scene is surely when, goaded beyond endurance in the training facility one day by Hamed as a misguided “elder”, Ingle in fact offers to step into the ring and fight him. All present in the gym is stunned and uncomfortable. How exactly is this extremely unwise confrontation going to play out? How precisely the ending? Certainly the champion is going to kill him? Or will he sentimentally hold back? It’s not clear.

Bright Spots and Comedy

This isn’t to imply that there aren’t some good moments. The actor elicits humor when Ingle informs a journalist what he’s teaching the youths from his neighborhood: to reject bias and when you encounter a offender, “Hit them in the bollocks”. It’s funny too when Hamed squirms at the ridiculous antics Ingle makes him do in the beginning: posing as the “monster from the East”.

Storyline and Final Thoughts

Regarding the rift, the movie shows this as being exacerbated by a revealing publication that the trainer is supposed to have written (a plot point clearly adapted from prior material), and there is an intriguingly imagined last discussion – although the emotional tribute that the boxer is reportedly given to his mentor after his death is merely referenced in the end titles, and not shown on film. There is interesting material here, but the punches fail to connect.

Giant screened at the festival and is available in British and Irish theaters from January 9.