🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.