🔗 Share this article

As the beleaguered Tories meets in Manchester for its annual party conference, it has much to ponder regarding its future direction. There is uncertainty if a clear direction is available. We are in difficult days for a governing group that now has almost nothing, if anything, new or unique to say to the public.

An Alternate Reality

Things could have turned out vastly better if tangible progress had been made on an priority that resonates with people nationwide: Social mobility. However the former leadership hadn’t got the basic understanding on how to turn the trendy talk on social mobility into actual implementation. For the two years after the 2019 election, it argued over what the phrase actually signified.

I was perplexed, because I’d already told Johnson what levelling up entailed when we first spoke about it during the contest for party leader. This terminology was language I created and used at the Department for Education to talk about life chances. It was our departmental mantra, and its meaning is clear: levelling up is the method by which we attain equality of opportunity – without removing opportunity away from those who already have it, but rather by providing options to those that are without.

Fundamental Idea

Another crucial education department term we used, “potential is equally shared across our country, yet chances are not”, served as a intentional wording, embodying the dual components of a equal opportunity plan. To begin with, talent spread evenly but not nurtured uniformly through our learning institutions. Second, chances not distributed fairly by businesses or our market. Thus, learning and employment were essential to achieving stronger social mobility. This represented an agenda about the community framework of our country – fostering people’s potential and linking them with opportunities.

What Levelling Up Became

How did levelling up evolve into under the Tory administration? Regional development money administered out of the DLUHC. Decorative floral displays and reconfigured roundabouts and roads. A white paper was launched almost thirty-six months after the leadership change, which saw current strategies rebadged under the new levelling up banner.

Therefore, a comprehensive equal opportunity plan went unpursued, as well as all the improvement that it may have generated – in investment, enterprise, financial planning, tax and in local regeneration. Additionally, in education, including a university system that has become a scapegoat for elected officials – despite the fact that it remains the most powerful engine of upward movement for young working-class people, like me, this country has had over the past 30 years. Maybe the primary source of social mobility, operating at scale.

The Importance of Aspiration

Aspiration is crucial for our country to succeed. For people to have aspiration, there needs to be a credible sense that effort and reward are linked; that if people aspire, they can succeed. For political leadership, being able to foster a outlook of positivity about the future is critical. Research by the research body at the academic establishment and others, published last month, showed that the ministry’s focus zones I established during my tenure – locally targeted strategies to enhancing learning results – led to young people in those areas being up to a significant margin more optimistic about their life ahead than those in similar areas without these initiatives in place. The evidence is clear: just making an authentic start on fair opportunity strategies can quickly and positively change how people perceive their prospects.

Lost Potential

Oblivious to this, and in the middle of its new leader election, in that period, the ruling party terminated the programmes. Why should any person in those communities vote for a organization that made that decision? This specific initiative is a clear case of what could have been a transformative administration strategy on social mobility, but that opportunity was totally misused. Approaches such as this can inspire hope and aspiration. Conversely, as the Tories discovered, breaking the promise of equal opportunity is the biggest blunder any political party can make. The public held accountable the government for its incompetence but, above all, for its failed pledges on levelling up.

Today’s Political Reality

Now the baton on social mobility and equality of opportunity has passed to a new administration. The previous terminology has been cast off. Labour has its own public messaging of “removing obstacles to success”. The organization that is gradually replacing the hapless incumbents, Reform UK, also has its own terminology – “economic renewal”. The terminology to talk about fresh prospects in communities like the one I grew up in, in the region. It suggests that an historical manufacturing base can revive into an modern manufacturing sector.

For voters, it must appear as a repetitive cycle. Same issue, alternative phrasing. But – as yet – no results.

The Way Forward

If Labour and Reform UK want to prevent the identical outcome, each group should take lessons from the previous government’s errors on social mobility; that equal opportunity talk is one thing, but actual achievement of improved opportunities is far more challenging. The UK’s chronically poor equal opportunity remains the key issue for our country, with young people unable to get a good job beginning, those putting in effort in employment with few results after the rent has been paid, and people across the country without any actual expectation their offspring will be able to do improve in life than they have.

Elected officials can discuss improved access as much as they want. However, which party has the political group that has the comprehensive policy agenda on life chances? None appear to exist. The first to achieve this, wins. Not just for themselves, but, significantly, for a entire nation that has never needed equal access so urgently.